Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Clin Virol ; 165: 105521, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20233590

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: European legislation defines as "near-patient testing" (NPT) what is popularly and in other legislations specified as "point-of-care testing" (POCT). Systems intended for NPT/POCT use must be characterized by independence from operator activities during the analytic procedure. However, tools for evaluating this are lacking. We hypothesized that the variability of measurement results obtained from identical samples with a larger number of identical devices by different operators, expressed as the method-specific reproducibility of measurement results reported in External Quality Assessment (EQA) schemes, is an indicator for this characteristic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Legal frameworks in the EU, the USA and Australia were evaluated about their requirements for NPT/POCT. EQA reproducibility of seven SARS-CoV-2-NAAT systems, all but one designated as "POCT", was calculated from variabilities in Ct values obtained from the respective device types in three different EQA schemes for virus genome detection. RESULTS: A matrix for characterizing test systems based on their technical complexity and the required operator competence was derived from requirements of the European In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR) 2017/746. Good EQA reproducibility of the measurement results of the test systems investigated implies that different users in different locations have no recognizable influence on their measurement results. CONCLUSION: The fundamental suitability of test systems for NPT/POCT use according to IVDR can be easily verified using the evaluation matrix presented. EQA reproducibility is a specific characteristic indicating independence from operator activities of NPT/POCT assays. EQA reproducibility of other systems than those investigated here remains to be determined.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Reproducibility of Results , COVID-19/diagnosis , Point-of-Care Systems , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques
2.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 61(4): 599-607, 2023 03 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2197305

ABSTRACT

This article discusses principles and concepts for ideal regulatory frameworks for diagnostics, and the expression of those principles in the EU IVDR. The authors present the benefits of regulatory frameworks and implementation approaches for diagnostics that are risk-based, globally convergent, connected, nimble and efficient, under the IVDR and with a future outlook. While many expressions of these principles can already be found in the EU IVDR text, and in its implementation approaches, their further embrace is needed in future EU diagnostic regulation. In the long term outlook, risk-based approaches can be extended to comprise entity-based excellence appraisals. Globally convergent approaches can be more explicit in e.g. qualification and classification of products. This will also help further reliance models. Better connections and cooperation between regulators across the healthcare spectrum including pharmaceuticals should be fostered. Nimble approaches such as Emergency Use Authorisations for pandemics are essential in highly regulated schemes like the IVDR and beyond. Finally, regulatory efficiency as in timely availability of IT infrastructure and oversight mechanisms is a distinguishing attribute of globally competitive diagnostic regulatory schemes. All the above needs consideration in the long term efforts to modernize the EU regulatory system, so that diagnostics can play their important role in clinical research as well as along the entire care continuum in the EU.


Subject(s)
Government Regulation , Humans , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Legislation, Drug , Diagnosis , Health Care Sector/legislation & jurisprudence , European Union
3.
J Proteome Res ; 20(2): 1415-1423, 2021 02 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1387126

ABSTRACT

The utility of low sample volume in vitro diagnostic (IVDr) proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectroscopic experiments on blood plasma for information recovery from limited availability or high value samples was exemplified using plasma from patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and normal controls. 1H NMR spectra were obtained using solvent-suppressed 1D, spin-echo (CPMG), and 2-dimensional J-resolved (JRES) spectroscopy using both 3 mm outer diameter SampleJet NMR tubes (100 µL plasma) and 5 mm SampleJet NMR tubes (300 µL plasma) under in vitro diagnostic conditions. We noted near identical diagnostic models in both standard and low volume IVDr lipoprotein analysis (measuring 112 lipoprotein parameters) with a comparison of the two tubes yielding R2 values ranging between 0.82 and 0.99 for the 40 paired lipoprotein parameters samples. Lipoprotein measurements for the 3 mm tubes were achieved without time penalty over the 5 mm tubes as defined by biomarker recovery for SARS-CoV-2. Overall, biomarker pattern recovery for the lipoproteins was extremely similar, but there were some small positive offsets in the linear equations for several variables due to small shimming artifacts, but there was minimal degradation of the biological information. For the standard untargeted 1D, CPMG, and JRES NMR experiments on the same samples, the reduced signal-to-noise was more constraining and required greater scanning times to achieve similar differential diagnostic performance (15 min per sample per experiment for 3 mm 1D and CPMG, compared to 4 min for the 5 mm tubes). We conclude that the 3 mm IVDr method is fit-for-purpose for quantitative lipoprotein measurements, allowing the preparation of smaller volumes for high value or limited volume samples that is common in clinical studies. If there are no analytical time constraints, the lower volume experiments are equally informative for untargeted profiling.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Lipoproteins/metabolism , Metabolomics/methods , Proteomics/methods , Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy/methods , SARS-CoV-2/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Biomarkers/metabolism , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/virology , Female , Humans , Lipoproteins/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Protein Interaction Maps , SARS-CoV-2/physiology
4.
J Proteome Res ; 20(8): 4139-4152, 2021 08 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1305356

ABSTRACT

Quantitative plasma lipoprotein and metabolite profiles were measured on an autonomous community of the Basque Country (Spain) cohort consisting of hospitalized COVID-19 patients (n = 72) and a matched control group (n = 75) and a Western Australian (WA) cohort consisting of (n = 17) SARS-CoV-2 positives and (n = 20) healthy controls using 600 MHz 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Spanish samples were measured in two laboratories using one-dimensional (1D) solvent-suppressed and T2-filtered methods with in vitro diagnostic quantification of lipoproteins and metabolites. SARS-CoV-2 positive patients and healthy controls from both populations were modeled and cross-projected to estimate the biological similarities and validate biomarkers. Using the top 15 most discriminatory variables enabled construction of a cross-predictive model with 100% sensitivity and specificity (within populations) and 100% sensitivity and 82% specificity (between populations). Minor differences were observed between the control metabolic variables in the two cohorts, but the lipoproteins were virtually indistinguishable. We observed highly significant infection-related reductions in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) subfraction 4 phospholipids, apolipoproteins A1 and A2,that have previously been associated with negative regulation of blood coagulation and fibrinolysis. The Spanish and Australian diagnostic SARS-CoV-2 biomarkers were mathematically and biologically equivalent, demonstrating that NMR-based technologies are suitable for the study of the comparative pathology of COVID-19 via plasma phenotyping.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Australia , Biomarkers , Humans , Lipoproteins
5.
Drugs Today (Barc) ; 57(6): 401-405, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1278161

ABSTRACT

The MedTech Forum 2021 was an online event at which participants from the field of medical devices, diagnostics and digital health openly shared their views on the latest trends, challenges and opportunities currently being faced. The event enticed representatives from around 30 companies from the healthcare sector, as well as those from competent authorities, notified bodies, healthcare providers, academia and patients. Parallel sessions distributed across 3 days enabled the audience to interact with the speakers through a live-chat platform. Various sessions covering health data space, digitalization and interoperability were held in a forum and were a highlight of the meeting due to the potential of health data for the improvement of patient management and healthcare systems. Hot topics included the imminent application of the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) in May 2021 and the application of the In Vitro Diagnostic Device Regulation (IVDR) by May 2022. European competitiveness in the healthcare sector, learnings from the COVID-19 crisis and how to make legislation more friendly with innovations were also topics widely discussed during the event. This report provides a summary of sessions on health digitalization, the application of the new European regulations and lessons learnt from COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
7.
J Proteome Res ; 20(2): 1382-1396, 2021 02 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1019738

ABSTRACT

To investigate the systemic metabolic effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection, we analyzed 1H NMR spectroscopic data on human blood plasma and co-modeled with multiple plasma cytokines and chemokines (measured in parallel). Thus, 600 MHz 1H solvent-suppressed single-pulse, spin-echo, and 2D J-resolved spectra were collected on plasma recorded from SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR-positive patients (n = 15, with multiple sampling timepoints) and age-matched healthy controls (n = 34, confirmed rRT-PCR negative), together with patients with COVID-19/influenza-like clinical symptoms who tested SARS-CoV-2 negative (n = 35). We compared the single-pulse NMR spectral data with in vitro diagnostic research (IVDr) information on quantitative lipoprotein profiles (112 parameters) extracted from the raw 1D NMR data. All NMR methods gave highly significant discrimination of SARS-CoV-2 positive patients from controls and SARS-CoV-2 negative patients with individual NMR methods, giving different diagnostic information windows on disease-induced phenoconversion. Longitudinal trajectory analysis in selected patients indicated that metabolic recovery was incomplete in individuals without detectable virus in the recovery phase. We observed four plasma cytokine clusters that expressed complex differential statistical relationships with multiple lipoproteins and metabolites. These included the following: cluster 1, comprising MIP-1ß, SDF-1α, IL-22, and IL-1α, which correlated with multiple increased LDL and VLDL subfractions; cluster 2, including IL-10 and IL-17A, which was only weakly linked to the lipoprotein profile; cluster 3, which included IL-8 and MCP-1 and were inversely correlated with multiple lipoproteins. IL-18, IL-6, and IFN-γ together with IP-10 and RANTES exhibited strong positive correlations with LDL1-4 subfractions and negative correlations with multiple HDL subfractions. Collectively, these data show a distinct pattern indicative of a multilevel cellular immune response to SARS CoV-2 infection interacting with the plasma lipoproteome giving a strong and characteristic immunometabolic phenotype of the disease. We observed that some patients in the respiratory recovery phase and testing virus-free were still metabolically highly abnormal, which indicates a new role for these technologies in assessing full systemic recovery.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Chemokines/metabolism , Cytokines/metabolism , Lipoproteins/metabolism , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy/methods , SARS-CoV-2/metabolism , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/virology , Chemokines/blood , Cytokines/blood , Female , Host-Pathogen Interactions , Humans , Lipoproteins/blood , Male , Metabolomics/methods , Middle Aged , Proteomics/methods , SARS-CoV-2/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL